| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
<_nv> t35t0r, no, but try commenting out individual lines
<_nv> and which line is 53?
<jamesd-> So it's hunting for a } that's missing, apparently.
<_m_> You should use a text editor that supports kissing.
<t35t0r> the if is messing it up
<t35t0r> if i comment out the if it's ok
<t35t0r> wtf???
<_m_> do you have any other comments in your code? Especially stuff that could get interpreted as a digraph or trigraph?
<roopjm> trigraph?
<t35t0r> i don't know what a digraph or trigraph are
<_nv> my kissing editor doesn't see the problem either.
<jamesd-> ??< for {
<jamesd-> I don't think the problem is with the code we see.
<jamesd-> It's with the code we don't.
<_m_> roopjm, t35t0r: sequences of 2 or 3 characters that get interpreted as other characters.
<roopjm> aha
<_m_> (like the so ugly <:: )
<jamesd-> <:: is so sad.
<t35t0r> http://rafb.net/paste/results/zlohnH40.html this compiles fine ...this is irritating
<_nv> I wonder if msvc has an option to disable digraphs and trigraphs
<_m_> that be a good thing. gcc only has an option to *en*able them. Wrong default.
<Jey> i prefer the disabled default
<_nv> oh, god, I'd rather have them off
<jamesd-> The gcc manual used to be quite offensive about trigraphs, saying "you don't want to know about this braindamage".
<Jey> if you want -pedantic, use -pedantic
<ScottC> my ****ing brother tossed some cable at my ****ing 500 dollar LCD monitor and now theres a tear in it
<Jey> send him an invoice
<_m_> Jey: does it enable di-/trigraphs?
<Jey> _m_: I think so?
<t35t0r> uggh this is ridiculous
<Jey> only time I got bit by a trigraph was with -ansi -pedantic iirc
<jamesd-> I'm surprised if -pedantic enables trigraphs.
<_m_> Yeah, that'd be new to me, too.
<t35t0r> wth!! i left out the { after the if and it compiled fine !!!
<jamesd-> Nope, not for me. echo '??<' | gcc -E -pedantic -
<Jey> ah ok
<jamesd-> -ansi does enable them though.
<jamesd-> So you get half marks.
<_m_> t35t0r: any comment with ??> or ??< in it? Any comment line that ends with a \ ?
<_m_> or with a ??/ ?
<roods> is there anyway to re***ign a reference?
<_m_> no
<jamesd-> roods: no. If you need reseating, use pointers (or smart pointers).
<roods> thanks
<Mws> Moin
<roopjm> can you do an ***ignment like: string x = char *y; ?
<jamesd-> roopjm: that's a syntax error, what's your real question?
<jamesd-> roopjm: you can do char array[] = "hello"; std::string x(array); if you like.
<roopjm> ah ok.. just wondering if you could ***ign char strings to std::strings
<roopjm> figured you could just wanted to make sure
<t35t0r> _m_, no ??> or \ or ??<
<t35t0r> _m_, removing that { after the if makes no sense at all
<t35t0r> _m_, what's more is that i have one method in the cl*** which is not even defined and it still compiles!!!
<t35t0r> something every strange is going on
<roopjm> its gremlins
<jamesd-> t35t0r: missing member function definitions won't cause compilation failures, though it may cause link failures, particularly if they're virtual or they're actually called.
<t35t0r> ok explain this one http://rafb.net/paste/results/sYEAzs74.html
<t35t0r> ?!?!?
<t35t0r> i don't even have that function anywhere in the .h file or defined anywhere else
<ZorbaTHut> t35t0r, maybe it's not compiling what you think it is?
<t35t0r> uhhh if i put the { after the if in it complains about eof
<t35t0r> if i leave it out it compiles
<jamesd-> t35t0r: template code may not be throughly checked unless it's instantiated.
<t35t0r> hrmm ok
<t35t0r> ok i instantiated an object of type quickSort
<Jey> but did you call doQuickSort on it?
<t35t0r> i'm getting missing ; before '}'
<t35t0r> but i see no missing ;'s
<t35t0r> and i;m also getting empty controlled statement found; is this the intent?
<t35t0r> what does that mean?
<t35t0r> the error is "empty controlled statement found; is this the intent?"
<_m_> I'm surprised we didn't have calcs for digraph and trigraph.
<jamesd-> t35t0r: have you yet pasted the whole source file?
<jamesd-> empty controlled statement sounds like a spare ';' at the end of a line. Maybe. Is it a warning, or an error?
<t35t0r> there were some comments that i took out and it fixed the problem
<t35t0r> very strange
<t35t0r> line by line compiling!!!
<_nv> t35t0r, what was the exact cause?
<Dweep_> Hello
<Dweep_> can anyone se the errors? http://home.no.net/dweep87/HELP
<ZorbaTHut> = and == are very different things.
<Jey> the predicates of your if statements are wrong
<Dweep_> can you help me to correct it?
<Dweep_> isn't == equal?
<_m_> == isn't equal to =.
<Dweep_> I know
<_m_> That's the problem in your code.
<_m_> (well, one of them)
<Dweep_> what shall I have
<Dweep_> ?
<ZorbaTHut> == is comparison
<ZorbaTHut> = is ***ignment
<ZorbaTHut> which one are you using on the lines with errors?
<Dweep_> =
<ZorbaTHut> is ***ignment what you want?
<NKD> they are in if statements
<NKD> the ='s
<NKD> He wants to use == instead
<ZorbaTHut> nkd, I'm trying to lead him to see that himself. :P
<_m_> The error message is trying to tell you that you can't convert the result of the ***ignment to bool.
<Dweep_> Ok, understand.. but If i'm using == I get another set of errors..
<NKD> Let me guess, you changed every = to a ==?
<NKD> :P
<ZorbaTHut> dweep, and this is why you need to *understand* the errors, not just ignore them
<NKD> a = 0 // That ***igns the value 0 to n
<NKD> a == 0 // that checks if a is zero
<NKD> er
<NKD> a = 0 ***igns value 0 to a
<NKD> not to n ;)
<Dweep_> ok
<Dweep_> http://home.no.net/dweep87/error is the other errors
<Dweep_> I get
<_m_> You can't concatenate c-style strings by using operator+.
<Dweep_> huh?
<ZorbaTHut> you can't add char* strings together like that. :P
<_m_> And you can't concatenate strings and int.
<Dweep_> ok?
<NKD> you are attempting to add an integer "alder" to your string
<Dweep_> ok, and thats not legal? I thought that wouldn't be a problem
<_m_> Well, it is not legal and that is the problem.
<NKD> Nope. You cant put an integer direclty into a string
<_m_> There are severals ways out of this problem.
<_m_> One way would be to restructure your code so that you don't need the int inside the string. This is fine as long as your code is only about printing.
<NKD> Yeah you could simply print the string and the integer seperately
<NKD> i.e. std::cout << stringVariable << integerVariable
<NKD> But if you need to convert an integer to text, it gets more complex (i dont know how to do that yet myself)
<_m_> The other ways all are about converting the int to a string. One method is to use stringstreams for the conversions. stringstreams work similar to cin/cout. However, they write to/read from memory instead of standard output/input.
<_m_> calc convert
<CalcMe> convert = Using the 'translators' built into the C++ stream libraries (which are extendable), a simple conversion technique is: #include <sstream> std::stringstream tempstream; tempstream << whatever; if ( tempstream >> whateverelse ) // conversion worked!;
<NKD> nice
<Dweep_> ok, it worked now.
<Dweep_> thank you all!
<_hhh_> try libc , stdc++ is not for all
<ricebowl> "jag.vill.se.dig.naken.net"?
<ricebowl> I'm not sure you really do :o
<OlaRune> me neither ;)
<ricebowl> heh heh
<OlaRune> you swedish?
<ricebowl> nope. You?
<OlaRune> yup
<Dweep_> Im norwegian
<OlaRune> ok
<OlaRune> sweet neighbour in the west
<Dweep_> yeah
<OlaRune> ^^
<OlaRune> ricebowl: norwegian too?
<ricebowl> ah
<ricebowl> no, American
<OlaRune> :P
Return to c++
or
Go to some related
logs:
ursin server irc channel"
practical uses of lipgloss
|
|