Help Logs Database

Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Ircnet  |  Dalnet
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41

<Kash> i need more peeps
<Rodney_> yeah i dont have very many listed from other schools
<fusQer> ok hold on i mest up
<techrush> haha
<fusQer> on the computer part
<techrush> ok
<fusQer> got hte human part down
<Rodney_> bout 15 or so
<techrush> yea computers are weird tho
<techrush> as in they could spit out some weird *** ****
<fusQer> ok if texas human points are the same, computer ranking 4, their BCS points are .9401
<techrush> although i geuss eliminating the highest and lowest and taking the average is pretty good way to eliminate oddball comp ratings
<fusQer> well im just looking at the overall computer final ranking
<techrush> yeah i know
<fusQer> and saying texas gets 4
<techrush> yep gotcha
<fusQer> which wont happen but...
<techrush> it could
<fusQer> ok VT wiht same human # and computer of 2 gets...
<fusQer> yah ur right heh
<techrush> its in the "realm of possibility"
<fusQer> .9237
<fusQer> VT is ****ed
<techrush> what if VT is #1 in comp
<fusQer> .94366666
<techrush> o_0
<techrush> so VT basically has to end up #1 in the computers to have a shot
<fusQer> well thats ***uming they gain 0 ground in human polls
<techrush> if UT and USC go unbeaten
<fusQer> lets put VT #1, UT #3
<techrush> ic
<techrush> wait
<fusQer> k VT has .9436
<techrush> how does the **** with the polls work ?
<techrush> its based on number of votes ?
<techrush> not just your place
<techrush> VT has a good shot then
<techrush> if they win out
<techrush> how could they not gain any votes
<fusQer> UT as computer #3 would have .9434
<fusQer> human polls its not based on rank, but based on actual # of votes
<techrush> yeah its gonna be close
<techrush> but honestly
<Rodney_> because texas and usc will probably hold the same number human votes
<techrush> i dont think VT will win out
<Rodney_> if they go unbeaten
<fusQer> damn that does not look pretty for texas
<fusQer> oh
<fusQer> VT has to be #1 in computers
<techrush> basically yea
<fusQer> in that scenario
<fusQer> lets put UT 2 VT3
<fusQer> i mean
<fusQer> VT2 UT3
<techrush> and to get #1 in comps they beat miami and FSU pretty handidly im ***uming
<techrush> so they may gain some votes in polls also
<techrush> thing is
<techrush> if ucla goes unbeaten
<fusQer> VT=.9237
<techrush> and usc beats them last game of year
<techrush> thats gonna be a huge boost to usc
<techrush> if if if or if if if but if blah blah if
<fusQer> UT=.9434
<fusQer> i dont think human polls fluctuate enough to make a difference
<fusQer> if USC loses though
<fusQer> texas is a for sure lock
<fusQer> cuz htey'll have most points in both humans
<techrush> yea
<techrush> werd
<fusQer> buuuuuut usc has that now
<fusQer> and isnt #1
<fusQer> Week 9 USA Today Poll
<fusQer> 1. USC (53) 7-0 1,540
<fusQer> 2. Texas (8) 7-0 1,493
<fusQer> Week 1 USA Today Poll
<fusQer> 1. USC (60) 0-0 1,547
<fusQer> 2. Texas (2) 0-0 1,405
<fusQer> lets take those #s from week 1
<fusQer> texas wont fall below that
<Rodney_> how about vt is ****ed
<fusQer> they're relaly not :(
<Rodney_> unless the dominate both miami and fsu they dont have a chance
<Rodney_> and i dont think they will dominate both of them
<Rodney_> theyll need more then just wins over both of them which will be hard enough for them
<fusQer> yah
<fusQer> computers they will not move to #1
<Kash> http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=russell+peters&pl=1&lv=0
<fusQer> im pretty sure
<fusQer> human poll texas will only drop if htey dont blow out every team
<fusQer> texas needs to put up 70 a game =\
<fusQer> run the score up as much as possible
<fusQer> damn
<fusQer> BC in the computer polls is at 16
<fusQer> VT 3
<fusQer> TT was 7
<fusQer> UT 2
<fusQer> so... we can safely ***ume that VT wont gain as much as Texas did in the computers
<fusQer> 1) the margin of victory over BC wasnt as great as Tex over TT
<fusQer> 2) BC is ranked way lower than TT was (in computers)
<Rodney_> vt has a lot more ground they need to gain
<fusQer> who did GA play last game?
<fusQer> cuz VT overcame GA in computer
<Rodney_> texas was a lot closer, the spread between 2-3 is huge
<fusQer> GA beat arkansas
<fusQer> and went from 4 to 5
<Rodney_> vt has to gain 2x what texas gained after beating #7 tt by 35
<fusQer> no
<fusQer> 3 to 5
<fusQer> oh man
<fusQer> my #s mean nothing
<fusQer> the computer ranking % isnt consistent week to week
<fusQer> for example in bcs week one
<fusQer> #2 team got .950 %
<fusQer> and week 2 got .940 %
<fusQer> bah
<fusQer> VT has a LONGSHOT but isnt persay ****ed
<fusQer> VT has to not only beat miami and FSU, but blow them out
<Rodney_> with their ability, they are ****ed
<fusQer> if FSU doesnt make it and another team does, that only hurts VT's chances, probalby seals them
<Rodney_> it is possible, just not probably at all
<fusQer> yah you got that right with their ability
<Rodney_> probable
<fusQer> i hate how they gave so much credit to VT's defense.... BC throwing for 5 yards on 3rd and 15
<fusQer> receivers dropping catches left and right
<fusQer> thast not to the creidt of the defense...
<fusQer> not when hte reeiver was untouched..
<Rodney_> eh ppl can ***** all they want but unless ucla is able to take usc, then tex and usc are 1 and 2, whichever order you want
<fusQer> yah there is NOOO way that VT is gonna blowout miami and FSU
<fusQer> and for htat to happen FSU has to get there first
<fusQer> if usc loses to ucla, i wonder where that will land ucla
<Rodney_> i dont think bama or uga will go undefeated
<fusQer> texas just needs to beat each team by at least 35
<fusQer> ga wont bama might
<Rodney_> what what kind of victory it will take ucla over usc to get #2
<fusQer> for ucla to get #2?
<Rodney_> err i wonder what kind of victory it will take ucla over usc to get #2
<Rodney_> well if they go undefeated until they play usc, they will surp*** uga and bama
<fusQer> they'll need alot of human help
<fusQer> where would u place ucla after beating usc
<fusQer> id still put them behind VT
<Rodney_> depends on how bad they beat them, i wouldnt give them #1 regardless
<Rodney_> if it was a decent win id put them ahead of vt
<Rodney_> depending on how vt looks against miami and fsu
<fusQer> yah if it was a blowout @usc
<fusQer> yah thats hte key
<fusQer> if vt wins out
<fusQer> id put uclgay at 3
<Rodney_> +14 by ucla and vt with 2 close victories, id put ucla as #2
<fusQer> yup
<DirtyGame> ne1 in here bet on sports???
<fusQer> VT wont be moving anywhere in teh computer polls this week as long as texas wins by at least 2.5TD's im guessing


Return to football
or
Go to some related logs:

metal

Copyright © 2005 www.irclogs.ws. All rights reserved. » disclaimer » contact