| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41
<LWest> that could be a title game
<norm-> im unbiased
<fusQuanto> georgia has no qb man they wont beat fla
<norm-> or impartial
<norm-> whatever
<fusQuanto> thsoe who say they are impartial and unbiased are always the most partial and always the most biased
<fusQuanto> and youv'e proved that too norm lol
<LWest> dj shockeys the man in georgia
<norm-> i dont have a team
<norm-> so itd be hard for me to be biased and partial
<Given2Fly> yeah right
<fusQuanto> [17:27] <norm-> but texas schedules crappy teams
<fusQuanto> [17:27] <norm-> in order to go undefeated
<fusQuanto> yah, not biased
<norm-> they do.
<norm-> or they did.
<Given2Fly> all teams do
<norm-> and they did next year too
<norm-> div1aa
<norm-> :/
<fusQuanto> yah cuz no teams would play them
<fusQuanto> not their fault everyones a *****
<fusQuanto> BC ****ign schedule WOFFORD
<fusQuanto> wtf IS WOFFORD???
<Given2Fly> you actually believe that, fusQuanto?
<fusQuanto> is that like waffles unviersity
<fusQuanto> Given2Fly: it was a game that big12 awarded (12th game) or whatever , usually schedules are made 5-10 years in advance
<fusQuanto> hte other schoools didnt deny it
<fusQuanto> but made excuses
<fusQuanto> whateverrrr
<fusQuanto> texas scheduled BC tho
<norm-> i wish all the top 25 teams would just play each other
<fusQuanto> i forgot waht year
<norm-> i hate watching college football
<Given2Fly> hmm..ducks play michigan in 07-08
<Given2Fly> quack
<norm-> because its always top 25 team versus nobody
<norm-> and blowouts arent fun to watch
<fusQuanto> "always"?
<norm-> even the latter part of the top 25 ****s
<fusQuanto> why do you ***** so much norm
<norm-> ok, not always, but a lot of the time
<fusQuanto> deal with it
<fusQuanto> thats the schedule
<fusQuanto> they are made half a decade ago
<norm-> yeah, and it should be changed
<fusQuanto> for you
<fusQuanto> ok
<norm-> maybe college wouldnt be so boring
<Given2Fly> ducks play fresno st 3 years in a row..odd
<norm-> whats the point of playing a far inferior opponent?
<norm-> dont waste your time
<fusQuanto> norm-: you have to play conference games
<fusQuanto> you only get 3 non conf games
<LWest> if i was over ncaa football i would do playoff by the rankings seeds with the top 12 teams
<fusQuanto> norm-: and ask usc what the point of it is
<norm-> yeah, **** conferences.
<norm-> everyone should abandon them
<norm-> like ND
<tek231> **** that
<norm-> thatd be awesome
<Staley> no **** you
<Staley> everyone should abandon you
<Staley> like your parents
<tek231> that would ****
<fusQuanto> HAHA
<tek231> there should be a playoff system based on conference champs
<fusQuanto> staley pwnz
<norm-> college football would be awesome if good teams played good teams every week
<fusQuanto> there will never be playoffs, the regents dotn want that cuz its less money
<fusQuanto> its all about the benjamins
<Given2Fly> there's no sport where that happens
<Given2Fly> so why should college football do it?
<norm-> because they dont even have a playoff
<fusQuanto> cuz norm wnats to thats why
<norm-> atleast college basketball has one
<LWest> ok how would playoffs be less money
<LWest> explain that to me
<fusQuanto> LWest: it wouldnt
<norm-> college basketball is kind of lame until march madness unless you go to the university
<fusQuanto> but convince the BCS of that
<fusQuanto> not me
<fusQuanto> LWest: ultiamtely it was the university regents who decided to go with the BCS
<fusQuanto> so if sec wants to *****
<fusQuanto> that their undefeated team didnt make it
<fusQuanto> they need to blame their university's regent
<fusQuanto> for voting for it
<fusQuanto> and then htey shoudl secede, and give up there 2millino $ slice of hte pie too
<fusQuanto> heh
<fusQuanto> sec should be split
<techrush> i think if their are 3 undefeated teams this year they will go to at least a 4 team play off system in the future
<fusQuanto> throw the big least out of the bcs bowl
<Given2Fly> flooder
<fusQuanto> and hte other sec half can have big elast'ls spot
<fusQuanto> that is most fair
<Scottie_> seems like the powers that be want a system in place where they have some say over who plays for the national title (given a choice of teams)
<Scottie_> and other bowls
<fusQuanto> Scottie_: well of course the #1 adn #2 teams do not want a playoff
<Scottie_> a playoff would take some of that away
<LWest> they should do a final four for the top unbeaten teams
<norm-> we wouldnt have ND in a major bowl if it was a playoff
<Scottie_> because the money (front end) would be there regardless
<fusQuanto> they shoudl just play 5 games and then begin the 64 team playoff like NCAAB
<techrush> **** ND
<norm-> lol @ 64 team playoff
<fusQuanto> ND ****s
<norm-> what a joke
<Scottie_> but if you have USC, Texas, Va Tech...and lets say alabama
<prkrastn8> 4 tem playoff
<norm-> have you ever played football?
<prkrastn8> 4 teams
<norm-> you cant play back to back like basketball
<prkrastn8> there is never more than 4 undefeated teams
<fusQuanto> norm-: thats why said start it at week 5, same # of total games
<norm-> why even have 5 games then
<norm-> thatd be kind of pointless
<Scottie_> the higher ups are going to want a say in who goes where and not necessarily leave it to what goes on between the lines
<fusQuanto> and the 4 udnfeated teams argument fails cuz as soon as you implement that, then teams will start scheduling the way USC did 2 adn 3 years ago
<fusQuanto> to easily go undefeated
<prkrastn8> 4 team playoff BEFORE THE BOWLS then then put the teams in the bowl according to who won
<fusQuanto> BCS has it right right now the way it is, to include SOS
<fusQuanto> they shoudl take the current BCS formula and have a playoff of the top 8 teams
<norm-> why dont all the winners of the rose/peach/etc play each other?
<fusQuanto> rose and peach
<fusQuanto> lol
<norm-> whatever
<techrush> yeah fusQuanto if they went to any sort of playoff system they would still use the BCS rankings to "seed" the teams
<fusQuanto> yah i knwo what you mean
<Scottie_> because any other reason for not having a playoff has little to no merit
<prkrastn8> i say 2 game playoff BEFORE BOWL Games then the winners go to the Championship game and the other 2 get another BCS game
<fusQuanto> cuz norm- you have alot to learn but basically the conference champs get the BCS bowls, big east gets one, their #1 team alst year was ranked like #20 and got orange bowl whereas the #5 ranked team could be the 2nd best SEC team and they wont get one
<Scottie_> yes. you can have sub bowls like that for earliest round games
<norm-> college football is so lame
<norm-> i dont want to learn anything more about it
<norm-> its ruined forever
<fusQuanto> prkrastn8: if they do do that then they should take the BCS as it is and take top 8 teams and make a playoff
<prkrastn8> $$$ is all you need to know
<ryan101> WVU #1
<prkrastn8> why 8? 8 teams done desirve a TITLE chance
<Scottie_> this is about tv. its why disney has their hand in it. these people want a say as to who plays where.
<fusQuanto> prkrastn8: but they'd haver to implement that 10 years from today so there wont be any bias agasint the #1/#2 teams (of today)
<prkrastn8> im saying TOP 4 get a chance to play in for the title
<norm-> why dont all the high popularity teams just play for the title, and everyone else can watch
<norm-> because all the big teams get the good players anyway
<techrush> haha norm-
<norm-> no <3 for small colleges like utah
<fusQuanto> prkrastn8: becuz the #8 team maybe 11-1 SEC team and the #1 team maybe USC of two years ago that had SOS #115/117
<prkrastn8> Fresno St
<techrush> UTEP #1
<Prae> U C L A
<norm-> although its amazing that a team with the recruitment of Oklahoma can **** so so bad
Return to football
or
Go to some related
logs:
MMM + americasarmy + swedish clan
|
|