| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83
<Emil^> but then again - americans works more hours annualy than damn near everyone else <tortus> the urge to censor is strong in establishment circles <Bloc> even private companies in the US had some fun censoring opposing ISP's last week <Cpt_Kirk> yeah - it seems americans work more than the chinese or japs do? <Bloc> level 3 and that other one <tortus> yeah. <tortus> that is not respectable, imho <Emil^> cpt_kirk - be reasonable - france's work weak is 32 hours <Emil^> cpt_kirK - american work from 40-60 hour weekly <Emil^> nice try <Bloc> not sure if working harder or smarter is more ideal <Emil^> bloc - of the 32 industrialized/modern countries - americans works **** hours <Cpt_Kirk> I dont think that contradicts what I just said. <Emil^> cpt_kirK - perhaps it's doenst - i just wanted to be clear <Bloc> i rather like spanish siestas <Emil^> americans are hard core workers - 2 weeks vacation is a blessing to most <Bloc> nap at 2 pm to 3 pm woot:) <Bloc> then stay out till 12/ 1 am drnking a partying <Emil^> i'de like to have a siesta and also drink absenth druing my time off as wel <Emil^> of all the industrial nations - american workers are the most fvcked <coldstove> not true. <Bloc> there are a of range i figure <Emil^> coldstove - keep in mine i said industrialiized nations <Bloc> there are a lot of range in american workers <Bloc> cripes bad grammar/spelling this time of day;P <coldstove> Emil^/ korean workers are much more pissed off than american workers <Emil^> bloc - no worries- my typinings is just as bad <Emil^> coldsstove - i said indusrialized countries - not 2nd world or 3rd world <Bloc> anyways:) peace out <coldstove> Emil^/that categorization is not effective to understand this world. <coldstove> Emil^/ korea is an industrialzed nation. <Emil^> coldstove - do what now? <Emil^> s. korea sure you can include them <Emil^> that's a toss up tho - not sure if they really are 2nd or 3rd world <Lotec> coldstove, S Korea or N Korea? <coldstove> Emil^/as you said, korea might be one of the 3rd world countries. but still it is industrialized. <coldstove> S.korea <Emil^> coldstove - well you love the UN - lets take their position <coldstove> I don't love UN. <tortus> i need to stop using google. i better download copernic again <Lotec> tortus, why/ <Emil^> coldstove _ sorry didn't meant o front <tortus> lotec: too much trash in the google returns <coldstove> that's ok. I'm just trying to say fact. <Emil^> coldstove - it is what it is <coldstove> when you say 3rd world, what does it implies? <Lotec> We should poll coldstove on our previous topic about the net <tortus> 3rd world means mostly agrarian, mostly illiterate <Emil^> coldstove - use common sensen plz - you knwo what i mean <tortus> second world is newly industrializing <Emil^> 1st world = modern 2nd world = technology <Emil^> 3rd world = well.............the rest <Emil^> c'mon dont tell me that the term 3rd world is esoteric <tortus> i have the characteristics in a econ text that is 5 years old. but i think the names have changed recently <coldstove> that's why I said it's not effective to describe this world. <tortus> 3rd world means mostly agrarian, mostly illiterate <Lotec> S Korea is 2nd world. N Korea is 3rd <tortus> 2nd world used to be code for communist, btw <Emil^> to really belive the term '3rd world' is esoteric?? that's rather austentationasly derived <coldstove> rather, it implies a kind of circle at the center US is located. <tortus> i think the 3 worlds are more a hamhanded way to describe the phase of the economy <Emil^> have you ever taken even a economics 101 course??? <coldstove> me? <Emil^> we shoudl not have to explain such blatent obvious facts <tortus> prolly less than 25% of people have taken econ 101 <coldstove> Emil^/ it's not a fact, it's a just tool to describe this world. <tortus> since, about 25% have a ba. and not all of those take econ <Emil^> coldstove - i hate to use big words - but well <Emil^> it's rather <Emil^> ostentatiously pedantic <tortus> coldstove: my opiniono is that all of economics is provincial and bigoted, if not outright offensive <Emil^> that is my best 2 word description <tortus> emil: i always liked "elephantine pedant" <tortus> i think a rebel said it though <Emil^> pedant......i can only ***ume is a derivitave <tortus> evelyn waugh? <tortus> coldstove: some economists have been just short of criminal in what they taught. <tortus> i spit on it all <coldstove> tortus/you went too much far <Emil^> tortus - i hear ya - but not near as elegeant of an adjetive <tortus> by spitting? <tortus> or calling them criminal? <tortus> i sorta liked the spit. i could give up criminal <tortus> malthus (sp) was criminal far as i am concerned, and he was a major figure in economics for decades <tortus> part of the eugenics movement <tortus> a leader <tortus> friend to the nazi <tortus> and who did he mentor? keynes <tortus> and who spouts keynes? <Lotec> coldstove, earlier we we're talking about the EU *demanding* the US relinquish control of the Internet to the UN. What do you think? <tortus> for me. that makes all of economics creepy <coldstove> Lotec/did I? I don't remember... <coldstove> Lotec/ I guess there was another coldstove ... <Lotec> cold, just before you came in. I just wondered what you think <coldstove> Lotec/did you verify him as korean? <arcade> Lotec: The "control over the Internet" is just an illusion. <arcade> Lotec: They're quarrelling about a bunch of root DNS servers. <Emil^> arcade - umm........ have you ever taken any computer cl***? do you understand even teh basics about routing? <Lotec> arcade, that is part of it <coldstove> Lotec/ I really don't have any memory of talking about EU.. <arcade> Emil^: Well, as that is actually what I work with .. ;) <arcade> Emil^: And sorry, the US don't control the BGP routing table. ;) <Lotec> cold, it was before you came in. I was trying to include you now that you are here <arcade> Emil^: the US controls the root DNS servers, which has nothing to do with routing., <Emil^> arcade - be proud them man you're smart <Emil^> arcade tell us how to better 'fix' this sytstem so the US has no control? <arcade> Emil^: You cannot just "fix" it. The point is that it's up the various DNS server operators which root servers they use, and common consensus _is_ to use the regular ones. <Emil^> i mean afterall the UN should be all about this - i mean how dare the US pretend to have a right to control sucha global entity <coldstove> Lotec/ok I got you. <arcade> Emil^: And since it's the internet after all, nothing _prevents_ the EU from setting up their own root servers, but no sane person would use them. <Chrisjoy> tyv er tyv <arcade> Emil^: The EU basically want to _hijack_ the current root servers.. kinda reminding me about Alternic. <Emil^> arcade - i mean how dare the us anyway pretend just cuz they spent billion to developt sucha stytem - how dare those b***tards think they should have a say over it <arcade> Emil^: Eh? So, if you make something .. it's under your control .. and everyone starts using it.. do you want to relinquish that control? <arcade> Emil^: "How dare microsoft sit on their windows operating system when all the world is using it! they should relinquish control to the UN!' <Lotec> arcade, I suspect the idea is to eventually censor the internet <Emil^> arcaade - well apparently the US is arrogrant to even remotely pretend they have a right to manage such a system <roster> the US is arrogant? <Emil^> yeah - the us is all about censoring **** - thank got for country's like iran <arcade> Emil^: Well, then the EU should try setting up their own root servers and talk ISPs into using those instead ("fat chance" ;) <roster> if anything its giving <roster> if arrogance follows thats your problem <Emil^> it's just wrong - how DARE THE US HAVE THE GALL to pretend to use teh internet for their purposes <arcade> Emil^: What's wrong? And I *hope* you are ironic. <Emil^> lets all piss on the US <coldstove> Lotec/I read the first part of the article that you told me...but I'm wondering..internet started in US...it was a kind of scholartic-military tool at the beginning. <Lotec> cold, yeah <Emil^> i mean **** the fact the us spent billions to develop the internet - it's not all a fair game type entity <Lotec> cold, our feeling is if they want control, let em build their own network and disonnect from ours <Emil^> the us has no right to use the internet at all - we need the UN to tell us how to use our technology i hear <arcade> Emil^: The internet was developed my many more nations than the US! ;) <tortus> a lot of individuals have volunteered to get internet going <arcade> Emil^: It's only fair that other countries get their share of the control of the internet, when other nations have done so much for it! <Emil^> arcade = yeah your'e right - the us has no right to claim any right <arcade> Emil^: Exactly! <tortus> and relinquished control of it time and time again <tortus> this is no time for petty nations to attempt a regulation <arcade> Emil^: I mean, look at the web, developed in Europe. <arcade> Emil^: I mean, look at IRC, which we're currently using - developed in Europe! <Emil^> arcade - the us - well piss on them - THEY ARE AMERICA - it's their job to spend billions to support the rest of world - how dare those fvckers to think they have the right <Emil^> any intellectual property of the US - fvck them ehh? <arcade> Emil^: Yup! The UN should take over the administration of both IP ranges, AS numbers, domain names, root servers, and so forth! <RainDog> haha <Emil^> the UN should take control over teh US military too for that matter <arcade> And when it proves too expensive, we'll just send the bill to the US, as they haven't paid their fees in full for many years anyways! <Emil^> the US has no right to pretend like their the police of the world ehh <Emil^> the US may have developed the internet - and they should continue to fund it for the rest of us!!! <arcade> I mean, it's the US fault that the UN is a tad inefficient from time to time - the US hasn't paid their dues, and you cannot be efficient without the money to burn! <tortus> can you buy stock in icaan? <tortus> i think it may be privately held <squidink> no.
Return to politics or Go to some related
logs:
suse 10.1 network gdwg install trondheim beginner
|
|