| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82
<US_Male> roygbiv: you mean like you fellate your dad?
<US_Male> oh, hit a sore spot there
<roygbiv> hehe
<US_Male> "hehe"
<TimothyW> did he say filet of flounder cause roygbiv never found her ?
<US_Male> can't talk with your mouth full eh ?
<roygbiv> You seem a bit annoyed, but Dr Phil will help you out.
<US_Male> roygbiv: well, have you been treated by any mental health professionals ?
<roygbiv> And if that doesn't work, I'm sure Judge Judy will service you.
<US_Male> answer the question.
<US_Male> did Dr Phil help your family ?
<roygbiv> US_Male, the definition of insanity is asking the same question over and over and expecting a different answer. Here, help yourself into your own straight jacket.
<US_Male> roygbiv: answer the question.
<US_Male> roygbiv: well, have you been treated by any mental health professionals ?
<roygbiv> <:)
<nharris> whew.. liberals out in full force on a friday night on other channels. I need exposure to rational conservatism to recharge
<US_Male> that means "yes" I suppose.
<roygbiv> You'll find it here nharris!
<nharris> yay!
<US_Male> as if we couldn't tell !
<roygbiv> I'm the most conservative dude you'll ever meet. I'd watch that US_Male though, he's had a bit too much to drink tonight.
<US_Male> nharris: roygbiv was just explaining his WTC conspiracy
<US_Male> roygbiv has been smoking crack again.
<Chrono-Z> To be fair it isn't his conspiracy, it's all borrowed stuff.
<nharris> ahh..
<Chrono-Z> Much like every other thing on IRC that people feel intelligent about repeating.
<US_Male> it's essentially his when he sells it here
<nharris> F911 is taken too much to be as gospel by the left.. a text as it were
<US_Male> you sell it, you're responsible for it
<roygbiv> I'm not borrowing anything. I'm doing my own research. But people like US_Male will only believe what they are handfed by television. Hey US_Male, I suppose you're going along with all of this indictment stuff too right?
<US_Male> roygbiv calls his insane rantings "research". Lol
<US_Male> that always makes me laugh ... "research"
<Chrono-Z> Let's be honest. You aren't researching anything, you are looking at websites that have already complied information.
<roygbiv> US_Male, yes, obviously I should be consulting the library of alexandria for all of my information. :)
<nharris> even Bowling For Columbine, which I expected to be a slam on gunmakers only, M. Moore couldn't resist his incessant liberal putz drives to dig into Bush.
<US_Male> roygbiv is clearly a pure ****ing nutbag .
<roygbiv> And such venerable works of non fiction like the holy bible.
<US_Male> actually, that's been known for years on this channel
<US_Male> I can't count the number of times he's bee banned for it.
<US_Male> I'm surprised he's back to sing his old nick, actually.
<nharris> except for the extreme right wing xtians, nobody uses the bible as more than guidelines... and I"m glad they do. There's some sound policies in it
<US_Male> using
<roygbiv> Yeah, usually because I piss off the establishment types like yourself who cling to their solid foundations of faith by ***aulting them with logic and alternative opinion.
<US_Male> roygbiv is synonymous with "nutbag trolling lunatic"
<US_Male> and has been for years.
<roygbiv> Ohh, you're getting more creative there. Don't push yourself outside the comfort zone US_Male.
<US_Male> it's well known. Hell let's rub his dirty nose in it.
<nharris> alternative opinion should be more than welcome.. I apologize if it hasn' tbeen. But M. Moore's ideas are anything BUT logic.
<roygbiv> It might shake your world views.
<US_Male> roygbiv: how does your **** smell there ?
<roygbiv> nharris, I agree, there's some decent stuff in the bible if you don't take it all literally. And a lot of it was very appropriate for the time it was written - 2000 years ago.
<Chrono-Z> You mean a couple of hundred years ago,
<Chrono-Z> Not 2000.
<nharris> Still appropriate now. Look at all the problems being unfaithful to your spouse causes. Look at the problems of wanton, casual ***.
<roygbiv> Hehe US_Male, usually we joke with each other but tonight you seem really bugged out. :B
<US_Male> roygbiv: now, when you take a **** in the channel, I'm going to rub your nose in it.
<US_Male> roygbiv: what.... I'm just playing my role.
<US_Male> you say loony things, I call you on it
<roygbiv> Hey, I never said my **** don't stink as much as the next guy's. But when I'm constantly attacked in here, you interpret my defense as moralising and grandstanding. :)
<roygbiv> And righteous liberal hippy doushism.
<roygbiv> douchism.
<US_Male> roygbiv: you are either trolling, or insane.
<US_Male> or both
<US_Male> you realize that much don;t you ?
<roygbiv> Trolling? How exactly? By presenting you with findings from my own research, which I present as possible alternatives?
<roygbiv> To your dogmatic and stone cast version of official history?
<US_Male> just because I point that out, doesn't mean I'm "mad" or anything silly like that.
<US_Male> it just means you don;t like reality pointed out
<roygbiv> reality? elaborate.
<US_Male> roygbiv: you have the dogma.
<roygbiv> What's my dogma? That I'm interested in asking questions?
<US_Male> I've made no claims or suggestions. You have.
<roygbiv> Yep I have, and you're fighting tooth and nail against them.
<US_Male> roygbiv: you weren't "asking questions"
<US_Male> scroll up and see what you said
<roygbiv> I know what I said.
<US_Male> roygbiv: not at all, I'm simpy saying how ridiculous your claims are.
<roygbiv> Why are they ridiculous?
<US_Male> no, you don't know what you said after that mny drinks
<US_Male> I think you're bombed out of your mind when you come here
<US_Male> roygbiv: prove one of your allegations, then.
<US_Male> if they aren't "ridiculous'
<roygbiv> Which part do you want me to prove? That the videos of the wtc building number 7 collapse look more like a staged demolition than how a normal steel reinforced building would collapse? I can show you videos and photos but would you care?
<US_Male> roygbiv: pick anything and pove it
<US_Male> prove
<US_Male> roygbiv: you should be able to prove it with text.
<US_Male> in a short paragraph
<roygbiv> Do you want to hear an audio file from the owner of wtc building 7 saying that he told the fire commander to "pull it", when that's how demolition crews referred to their demolition of wtc building 6 after 9/11?
<US_Male> roygbiv: "look more like a staged demolition " is way too nebulous
<US_Male> anything you can prove ?
<US_Male> roygbiv: so, if the guy said "pull it" , then prove what he meant
<roygbiv> All I'm saying is that the evidence available - the FEMA reports, the audio files, the video files, the photography, other buildings in the world, point to the likelyhood that this was a staging demolition rather than the building collapsing of its own accord. I have no opinion either way on the twin towers, but building 7 is highly suspicious.
<roygbiv> Yet the government removed all of the debris quickly afterwards and melted it down for recycling without thorough investigation.
<US_Male> roygbiv: in other words, you can't prove anything
<US_Male> anything you can prove ?
<roygbiv> US_Male, what don't you understand here?
<US_Male> roygbiv; what don't YOU understand ?
<roygbiv> Next you're going to ask me to prove evolution. ;)
<US_Male> roygbiv: perhaps you don;t have a clue what "prove" means.
<US_Male> so now you're admitting you can;t prove it, correct ?
<roygbiv> The only way you can prove anything is by looking at a large pool of evidence and drawing your own conclusions. I've drawn my conclusions, I'm not telling you to believe anything. I'm just presenting the evidence and asking you to think for yourself. If you don't agree with my conclusions, fine! :)
<US_Male> because I've offered you many chances and opportuniies to prove your claims.
<roygbiv> And I've pointed you towards numerous photographic, video and audio evidence.
<roygbiv> What more do you want?
<US_Male> roygbiv: OK, so now you're admitting you can't prove it.
<US_Male> that's fine. As long as you openly admit that.
<roygbiv> Who ever said I was out to prove anything?
<Chrono-Z> I want picture of scooter libby planting the charges in the pillar of building 7!
<US_Male> as long as you admit you can't
<roygbiv> hehe chrono
<Chrono-Z> :)
<roygbiv> US_Male, duh I would have told you that in the first place.
<US_Male> ---> [01:20] <roygbiv> Which part do you want me to prove?
<US_Male> roygbiv: no, you indicated you would prove some of your claims
<roygbiv> It's a problem that you can't convey tone over irc.
<nharris> I'm an engineer and even I realize the human body is just too complicated to have just "fallen into place over time."
<nharris> and beer awaits!
<roygbiv> Ahh US_Male, I'm sorry if I gave that impression that I stood 100% behind this theory, because I don't.
<US_Male> well you were sure tryint to sell it though
<US_Male> trying
<US_Male> and apparently even you don't really buy it
<roygbiv> Yeah, that's because I'm leaning towards this theory, though I won't discount the possibility that it fell down on its own (however small that may be).
<roygbiv> If I didn't think it had any legs to stand on I wouldn't have brought it up, but the evidence presented is compelling.
<US_Male> I'd rather deal in solid evidence
<Chrono-Z> It's all about being in a grey area people. Everything can't be black and white.
<US_Male> ifbut to try and use shaky claims to suggest other things, is really lame
<roygbiv> Unless you're suggesting the video/audio/photos were doctored, then what we can see is as solid as it's going to get.
<US_Male> -if
<roygbiv> What you draw from them though is open to interpretation.
<roygbiv> I guess you draw something different than I do, which is perfectly acceptable.
<US_Male> if that's as solid as it gets, then aparently there's no solid evidence
<roygbiv> There never will be because the solid evidence was removed very quickly.
<US_Male> and most certainly can't then be used to draw nebulous suspicions in general
<US_Male> roygbiv: that's a conspiracy mechanism "I can't show you evidence because the evidence was taken"
<Guest14> u know what i think we genocide muslims, blacks, and all communist then the world would be a better place
<US_Male> sing that "logic" I can make up anything and say the evidence was removed
<US_Male> err, using
<roygbiv> Well I would be interested to hear the opinion of expert engineers on the matter. To have them watch the footage, look at the blueprints and give their opinion.
<roygbiv> But the media isn't asking the questions.
<US_Male> I can give you a link from Popular Mechanics
<US_Male> I haven't read it all it's pages and pages
<roygbiv> Guest, why don't you lead by example and do yourself first.
<roygbiv> ok, what's it about?
<Chrono-Z> Guest14 I'm not following what you are saying. Could you try again and be a little more clear?
<Guest14> cause white people are better then those inferior races
<roygbiv> Just like.. ummm, strawberry is better than blueberry?
<roygbiv> Cause **** that, I want both.
<Chrono-Z> Oh just a troll, nevermind my request then.
Return to politics
or
Go to some related
logs:
|
|