| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2
<drudge-> hello
<drudge-> alz, you alive?
<drudge-> anyone tried openchanfix with ratbox 2.0.9+openservices
<AndroSyn> i should hope so
<AndroSyn> seeing that chanfix here on efnet is running it
<drudge-> i followed the docs but i can't a) whois chanfix on server it's running on, b) i can whois it on other servers, but can't do anything else, even kill it
<drudge-> AndroSyn, any idea
<AndroSyn> not sure
<drudge-> :(
<graphix> sup
<graphix> if the ircd doesn't resolve the ip to host. its the server and not a miss configured option
<anjuta> if it's a client connection, the straight and the reverse resolves should match
<drudge-> wow openservices ****s
<anjuta> drudge-, ask me about hybserv :)
<drudge-> all i want is chanfix
<jilles> I think the original chanfix ****s more than ocf
<drudge-> jilles, well i dunno but maybe the ratbox version .. openservices patch ****s because i couldnt tell u what you i did wrong
<drudge-> followed the readmes right in
<graphix> thanx
<graphix> hello again
<graphix> where are the documents on ratbox
<graphix> just have to guess on it
<anjuta> doc/ ?
<graphix> not much there
<jilles> there's quite some stuff in doc/
<jilles> help/ also
<graphix> i am looking in it now
<graphix> trying to figure out why spoofs aren't working on normal users
<graphix> do auth { blah blah blha}; do i need to setup something else with that
<graphix> or should auth be the only thing i need
<jilles> auth alone should do
<jilles> mind the ordering
<graphix> ah that would make sense then
<graphix> i think i have users *@* befor it
<graphix> thanx
<anjuta> topmost matches first
<graphix> you guys are awesome!
<graphix> thanx
<anjuta> what is the reason for a "no responce from ..." server disconnect ?
<ShadowGod> timeout?
<ShadowGod> lag?
<ShadowGod> they had a fight and arent talking anymore?
<anjuta> those are 2 servers, running on the same mashine..
<anjuta> the one splitting is a statistic service
<jilles> ping timeout
<jilles> most likely the statistic service is doing some operation in a blocking fashion
<jilles> like NFS, DNS lookup, &c
<anjuta> it's only counting the clients and generating mrtg stats..
<anjuta> ok, i'll take a closer look at it later, it's not excluded it's hanging somewhere
<jilles> or it's hanging and that triggers a bug in ratbox's I/O system
<jilles> causing it to never read anymore
<anjuta> i doubt it
<AndroSyn> it wouldn't be completely outside the realm of possibility though
<anfl> reet
<anfl> so what do we want to do before 2.2.0rc1?
<AndroSyn> i still need to do the kline crap
<anfl> im still debating whether I wanna move dlines over to a patricia or not
<anfl> I am gunna cleanup HIDE_SPOOF_IPS
<anfl> and move it over to a conf option
<sjk> Patricia?
<AndroSyn> i'd avoid moving dlines for 2.2..
<anfl> im inclined to agree
<anfl> CONF_SKIPUSER is gunna help a lot
<anfl> hmm
<anfl> what version of flex did you build 2.2 with?
<AndroSyn> 2.5.4
<AndroSyn> aka flex-old in debian
<anfl> 2.5.31 not safe?
<AndroSyn> well that + gcc2.95 generates some serious crap :P
<AndroSyn> that doesn't actually compile
<AndroSyn> http://www.google.com/search?q=flex+2.5.31+problems
<AndroSyn> heh
<anfl> nice
<anfl> bleh
<anfl> theres some pointless **** in trace
<AndroSyn> at some point it might be nice to cleanup some of the very obviously wrong comments that are around as well..
<AndroSyn> :P
<AndroSyn> like some of the 20 line discussions that haven't applied for many years
<anfl> aye
<anfl> hum
<anfl> I wonder if anyone is actually using IGNORE_BOGUS_TS
<anfl> theyre buggered if they are :p
<AndroSyn> heh
<anfl> besides
<AndroSyn> that code is just asking for things to get ****ed up
<anfl> it was designed for a day when a TS0 channel was the end of the world
<anfl> chanfix makes it irrelevant nowadays, as you can recreate it and keep ops.
<anfl> btw
<anfl> what do you think about hardcoding HIDE_SERVERS_IPS in?
<anfl> I dont see a particular reason for keeping it
<AndroSyn> seems reasonable to me
<anfl> hum
<sjk> I want fancy /WHO flags in ratbox, like ircu has. Eg, /who *blah* %in would display ip and nick
<anfl> sendto_realops_flags(UMODE_ALL, L_ALL, "Link %s dropped, non-TS server",
<anfl> get_server_name(client_p, HIDE_IP));
<anfl> you know
<anfl> im really not sure how this has any benefit :p
<AndroSyn> heh
<anfl> because it will *always* be "Link [@255.255.255.255] dropped, non-TS server"
<sjk> Or, /who *blah* h%in would display ip and nick of users with blah in their hosname, /who *blah* r%in would display users with *blah* in their gecos
<sjk> Would rock when doing abusereports ... /who #channel %i to get all ips
<anfl> sjk: we cant guarantee we have the ips for all users
<sjk> Ah. Hrm
<anfl> and if I was gunna do anything, id just make etrace work on channels
<anfl> :p
<sjk> Yeah, that'd be neat
<anfl> youd have to be in it of course, but :)
<AndroSyn> you should make who work in a completely different fashion, and then umm...**** clients or something
<AndroSyn> yeah
<AndroSyn> thats it
<anfl> andro: you know
<AndroSyn> heh
<sjk> /etrace !#channel :P
<anfl> andro: im tempted to just remove the oper notices for "unknown" servers
<anfl> and log them only
<AndroSyn> well the notices are kinda useful, imho
<AndroSyn> as you might wanna know if someone is up to some shady stuff..
<anfl> actually including "[@255.255.255.255]" in the notice grates on me
<anfl> :p
<AndroSyn> well yeah, its annoying :P
<anfl> is there a real benefit?
<anfl> would you ever actually *do* anything about seeing them? :)
<anfl> because I wouldnt..
<AndroSyn> i do
<AndroSyn> i dline the bastards ;)
<anfl> but lemme guess
<anfl> you dline them only because the notices are annoying you?
<anfl> :)
<AndroSyn> i dline them because i don't want the ***hats doing stupid **** ;)
<AndroSyn> weee..30 new nodes finally came in for the beowulf cluster...
<AndroSyn> now we just can't happen to figure out what happened to the rack we ordered for them...
<AndroSyn> and it looks like we're going to be putting in another order for 30 more..
<AndroSyn> that'll put us up to 240 cpus :)
<ShadowGod> heh
<ShadowGod> reminds me of time friend of mine went to a local computer shop.. thats been around for over 10 years
<ShadowGod> he was asking about racks
<ShadowGod> the guy there was like "what kind of rack? a gun rack?"
<AndroSyn> these are all opteron 250 cpus
<sjk> Btw, rserv ... wouldn't it be cool to be able to /msg chanserv suspend #channel <reason here>? Right now admins can suspend channels, and the other admins will not have any idea why
<sjk> would be great to be able to add some kinda note
<anfl> probably :)
<anfl> but I doubt ill do work on rserv unless a bug comes up
<anfl> or I find something quite substantial to do
<anjuta> indeed, on my network we keep track of the admin that did the "suspend" aswel and the time it happened
<anfl> rserv tracks who did the suspend
<sjk> Hrm
<sjk> I could try code it
<AndroSyn> strlcpy(who->name, client_p->name, sizeof(who->name));
<AndroSyn> i'm not sure why on earth we're using strlcpy() there...
<AndroSyn> if who->name can't fit client_p->name in it...
<AndroSyn> we've got big problems anyways
Return to ratbox
or
Go to some related
logs:
|
|